Connect with us

Californians Warned of $12 Billion Nuclear Bill

Evening sets on the San Onofre atomic power plant in northern San Diego County, south of San Clemente, California/California’s Governor Gavin Newsom smiles for the camera/A large pile of US cash
Source: David McNew/Getty Images/Justin Sullivan/Getty Images/Canva

California’s Governor, Gavin Newsom, is known around the state and the country for his controversial decisions. The most recent of which is the funding of a nuclear power plant that will cost California residents billions of dollars.

While Gov. Newsom has already pledged to support Pacific Gas & Electric’s nuclear plant, now that it’s estimated to cost a whopping $12 billion, Californians are begging the Democratic leader to withdraw from the deal before it’s too late.

California Legislation Passed PG&E’s Wildly Expensive Power Plant

Source: Shutterstock

Pacific Gas & Electric Company, more commonly known as PG&E, operates the only nuclear power plant in California: Diablo Canyon. The giant facility, which sits on 1,000 acres of land along the Pacific coast, contains two incredibly powerful nuclear reactors.

In 2022, California Legislature, including a sign off by Newsom, approved a plan to extend Diablo Canyon’s operating license for another five years to expire in 2030. Additionally, the Golden State’s government agreed to continue funding billions of dollars to keep PG&E’s Diablo Canyon running.

The Diablo Canyon Power Plant Creates Clean Energy for California

Source: Wikipedia

The reason why Califonia agreed to continue funding the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in the first place is because it provides a total of 18,000 gigawatt-hours of electricity every year. That’s enough energy for three million Golden State residents for the entire year.

What’s especially exciting for California’s government about PG&E’s nuclear power production is that it releases zero carbon emissions into the air, making it one of the most environmentally friendly energy sources on Earth.

Nuclear Power Might Be the Future

Source: iStock

The nuclear power generated from Diablo Canyon is unquestionably helping the state of California combat the ever-growing negative side effects of climate change.

But in order to truly utilize nuclear power to replace fossil fuels, California would need a whole lot more of it. Some say California should fund and focus on building more reactors to power the state, whereas others argue it’s far too expensive and not the best option for California’s green energy initiative.

Gavin Newsom Is Dedicated to Transitioning California to Entirely Green Energy Sources

Source: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

In 2022, Gov. Newsom announced California’s Climate Plan, which explained that the state will cut air pollution by 71%, slash greenhouse gas emissions by 85%, and decrease gas consumption by 94%, all by 2045.

But just two years later, the governor is struggling to make this plan a reality. And although Newsom claimed the plan would save Californians money, it’s becoming increasingly more expensive to live in the Golden State.

The Cost of Operating the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Plant Has Increased by 250%

Source: Freepik

When California’s legislature initially agreed to continue funding the nuclear plant, the investment was supposed to create substantial clean energy for residents to assist in Gov. Newsom’s zero-emission plan.

But things have changed since the initial approval. By May 2023, just six months after California and Newsom approved the funding for Diablo Canyon, the estimated operational costs were still $5.2 billion. But by February 2024, that estimation had skyrocketed to $8.1 billion, and in March, they reportedly said it would cost an almost unbelievable $11.8 billion to run until 2030 as planned.

The EWG Is Begging Newsom to Pull Out of the Deal

Source: EWG

This information was released not by PG&E but by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) of California. EWG is a nonprofit, nonpartisan American activist group that fights for the safety of every American citizen.

They believe that spending billions on nuclear energy is a huge mistake. EWG published an article last week that said, “Now the public knows the actual price tag (at least what PG&E is currently admitting) is closer to $12 billion. And that figure excludes all of the enormously expensive safety improvements nuclear experts insist are needed for the two nuclear reactors.”

“Financial Benefits Exceed the Costs”

Source: Freepik

However, a PG&E spokesperson has commented on the situation, claiming that the $12 billion figure is wildly inaccurate.

PG&E contests that the current estimate is only $8.3 billion, and that, more importantly, the “financial benefits exceed the costs.” They wholeheartedly believe that funding the nuclear power plant could save California from the effects of climate change and is worth every penny.

Californians Are Already Seeing the Negative Side Effects to Climate Change

Source: Freepik

While the negative consequences of climate change are being felt all over the world, because of California’s geographic location, it is experiencing more side effects than many other regions.

According to the state’s Department of Justice, California is already seeing rising sea levels and coastal flooding, water shortages due to minimal snowfall, intensified wildfires, extensive storms, flash floods, damage to agriculture, and rising temperatures. If nothing is done, it will get far worse for California in the very near future.

Gov. Newsom’s Clean Energy Initiatives Are Costing Residents Money

Source: Freepik

Although it’s almost impossible to deny the effects of climate change in California, some residents are frustrated that Gov. Newsom’s clean energy initiatives are costing them a fortune.

From electricity bills to taxes, Californians pay more than Americans who live in almost any other state. To make matters worse, California doesn’t even offer tax breaks to residents using green energy sources, like solar and wind, as other states do.

It’s Too Expensive to Live in California Now

Source: iStock

Over the past couple of years, hundreds of thousands of people have fled California to other nearby states with a far lower cost of living.

The Golden State has one of the highest costs of living in the US, and many residents either cannot afford to live there any more or are simply tired of spending all their hard earned money on taxes, rent, utilities, and groceries.

Will California Continue to Spend on Nuclear Power?

Source: Freepik

The general consensus these days is that California needs to find some way to minimize its costs for residents, otherwise, it’s going to be all but empty. However, in order to do that, California Governor Gavin Newsom needs to stop spending billions of dollars every year.

Whether or not the governor will retract his approval of the PG&E nuclear power plant funding is yet to be seen but it seems unlikely. The governor and the California government seem set on their plan to spend a fortune on green energy, even if it means losing residents in the process.

Advertisement
Advertisement

You May Also Like

The Most Dangerous Tree in the World Grows in the United States – It’s 12,000x More Lethal Than a Rattlesnake

Thousands Of People Live Downstream From Dams- Most Do Not Realize The Potential Risks

Kroger CEO Defends High Prices, Claims It’s not The Company’s Fault

New Study: West Coast Faces an Imminent Catastrophic Earthquake – ‘The Big One’

Culture War in America Is Destroying the Media Industry

Creator of Ozempic Defends the High Price Point, Saying It’s Reducing the Cost of Obesity

World’s Largest Man-Made River Faces Challenges in $25 Billion Initiative

DeSantis Approved Religious Guidance in Florida Schools- Satanic Temple Vows to ‘Raise Hell’