Newsom Signs Bill to Ban Popular Snacks Due to Cancer-Causing Chemicals

The bill aims to remove snacks that contain a plethora of “toxic” and cancer-causing ingredients such as brominated vegetable oil and potassium bromate. This could see popular snacks such as Skittles PEZ and over junk foods removed form the market.

This led to California Governor Gavin Newsom signing a bill into power last fall that prohibits the manufacturing and sale of snacks that contain certain ingredients, per Fox Business.

According to researchers, the ingredients are linked to neurobehavioral effects in children, digestive problems, and an increased risk of cancer, per Consumer Reports.

However, the Golden State is not the only one looking to ban harmful ingredients. New Jersey, New York, Illinois, Missouri, and Pennsylvania are all working on new food laws.

Like California, the New York Senate aims to ban propylparaben, red dye 3, brominated vegetable oil, potassium bromate, and titanium dioxide.

Whereas Illinois introduced its own version of a bill last fall that prohibits the manufacturing, distribution, and sale of food items and drinks that contain brominated vegetable oil, propylparaben, potassium bromate, and red dye 3.

The FDA stated that it “can no longer conclude that this use of BVO in food is safe.”

While the snacks won’t be outright banned, they will have to alter their recipe to align with the new laws.

“Californians shouldn’t have to worry that the food they buy in their neighborhood grocery store might be full of dangerous additives or toxic chemicals,” Gabriel said in a news release. “This bill will correct for a concerning lack of federal oversight and help protect our kids, public health, and the safety of our food supply.”

“What we’re really trying to get them to do is to change their recipes,” he told the newspaper. “All of these are nonessential ingredients.”

“Why are these toxic chemicals in our food?” said Little in a statement.

“We know they are harmful and that children are likely eating more of these chemicals than adults. It makes no sense that the same products food manufacturers sell in California are sold in the EU but without these toxic chemicals,” she said.

This ripple effect can enhance consumer protection worldwide, encouraging other regions to adopt similar measures to ensure safer food products.

Snack companies are responding by reformulating products and strengthening their branding around health and safety, aiming to retain customer trust and market share ahead of the 2027 enforcement.

This shift not only helps in aligning with the law but also in appealing to a health-conscious consumer base, thereby potentially increasing market competitiveness and innovation in the snack industry.

However, it also opens opportunities for these businesses to differentiate themselves by creating new, healthier snack options, tapping into the growing market for clean eating.

Critics argue that the ban is unnecessary and will lead to job losses and higher prices for consumers.

This public health victory could lead to reduced medical costs and a healthier future generation, as fewer harmful chemicals are consumed.

However, portion control and balanced diets still play crucial roles in maintaining a healthy weight, and it is important not to rely solely on clean snacking options.

California’s aggressive stance could potentially serve as a model for comprehensive national food safety standards.

These initiatives aim to empower consumers with knowledge, enabling them to make healthier food choices and pressuring companies to maintain high safety standards in their product offerings.

Less reliance on chemical additives ultimately means fewer pollutants in waste streams, promoting a more sustainable and eco-friendly food production landscape.

By providing evidence of the health risks associated with certain food additives, researchers have influenced policymakers to enact laws that prioritize consumer health over industrial convenience, setting a precedent for evidence-based regulation.

As more states witness the positive impacts of such laws, there could be a push towards federal regulations, leading to a unified, stringent approach to food safety across the U.S.