Connect with us

Republicans Face Harsh Criticism After Proposed $30 Billion Reduction in SNAP Benefits

A split photo with a man wearing a black suit jacket with a red tie in front of an American flag. The other photo is a deli counter at a grocery store
Source: Public Domain/Wikipedia Commons and Smith Collection/Getty Images

Republican Representative Glenn “GT” Thompson, chair of the House Committee on Agriculture that oversees the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), is facing massive backlash.

The representative from Pennsylvania suggested massive budget cuts to the SNAP program that will have detrimental effects for Americans who receive the food benefits.

Details of the Budget Cuts

Source: Freepik

Thompson drafted a new Farm Bill that outlines U.S. food and agriculture policy, including a change in popular supplemental food benefits.

The proposal would cut SNAP benefits by $30 billion over 10 years. It seeks to change the spending structure by preventing the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from changing the price of the Thrifty Food Plan. The plan also determines how much money could be released to residents through the SNAP program each year.

Opponents of the Program Highlight Issues

Source: Raul Gonzalez/Unsplash

Critics of the new plan say that the amounts cut will prevent hungry families from affording essential items in the home. Reducing benefits would also prevent families from affording fresh, healthy food, which often costs more than pre-packaged and highly processed alternatives.

The USDA restrictions would force users of the SNAP program to shift their eating habits. In America, obesity is considered an epidemic, and giving families in need less funds and resources to eat healthy would contribute to the growing problem.

Thompson Doubles Down on Cuts

Source: USDAgov/Wikipedia Commons

When asked about the issues posed by a massive reduction in funding, Thompson told Newsweek, “They’re being disingenuous, they’re being misleading, and maybe some of them— there are some I think that started this—that are perhaps lying for political purposes, which is really shocking when it comes to the Agriculture Committee.”

He went on to state that cuts need to be made to social services to save funds. He also considers the changes an important review of the USDA.

Democratic Opponents Say: Not So Fast

Source: @SenStabenow/X

Senator Debbie Stabenow (MI-D), chair of the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, had some strong words for the Republican this week. She specifically rejects the idea of making budget cuts by altering the SNAP program.

She noted that seniors and families with children will feel the brunt of the change. Those who participate in the program are in need of additional financial assistance to feed themselves. SNAP benefits only allow someone to purchase fresh and canned fruits and vegetables, meat, bread and grains, and select snack foods.

Drastic Changes for Individuals on SNAP

Source: Maria Lin Kim/Unsplash

In an interview, Stabenow noted that SNAP recipients currently receive a mere $6.00 daily. The funds are often just enough to add a few staples and to ensure that their nutritional needs are being met.

Under the new proposal, that number would be whittled down to $1.50 a week. The massive cuts would have detrimental effects on those who rely on the program to feed themselves and their families.

Food and Politics Are Tightly Intertwined

Source: Mango Star Studio/Getty Images

The discussions and disagreements around food have often informed the policies created by the House Agriculture Committee.

Stabenow noted that the politics that inform nutrition in America are often prescribed by bills and legislation. What is allowed on grocery shelves is informed by the laws passed and the ability of certain policymakers to be informed by lobbyists.

Thrifty Food Plan Recently Updated to Benefit Americans

Source: Wikimedia Commons

In 2021, the House Committee agreed to new terms for updating the Thrifty Food Plan for the first time in decades. The plan maps out the cost of a healthy diet across varied price points. The changes allowed those on benefits more buying power on healthy items in grocery stores to account for the lowest cost of healthy groceries per month. 

The directive overhauled the original plan created in the 1960s. Under the new program, SNAP recipients were given an extra $36 monthly to spend on their grocery bills.

How Many People Use the Benefits?

Source: jimmy Dean/Unsplash

Each month, more than 41.2 million Americans participate in the SNAP program. The average amount received is roughly $230.88 as of 2022.

Federal SNAP spending amounted to more than $119.5 billion and accounted for 65% of the USDA nutrition assistance spending. The large number directly reflects the amount of seniors, individuals, and families who have issues making ends meat each month.

Thompson Looks Forward To Backing up His Bill

Source: Wikimedia

Rep. Thompson noted that his “friend” Stabenow “needs to be focused on the Senate and spend less time talking about the House” in response to her comments about the proposed budget cuts.

He believes that the disagreements over the SNAP spending will make it to the House and Senate so that he can back up his proposal in front of a crowd.

Stabenow Accuses Republicans of Hypocrisy

Source: @thehill/X

The Republican platform has often attempted to appeal to low-income and rural Americans who struggle to afford everyday items like gas, groceries, and rent. 

Stabenow questioned their loyalty to their constituents by calling out the supposed hypocrisy of standing for a more affordable America while cutting essential benefits. She believes that the plan will fail to receive the votes to pass through the Senate. 

Source: Providence Doucet/Unsplash

With food uncertainty on the rise, many lawmakers have discussed expanding the reach of SNAP benefits instead of shrinking them. More than 17 million families suffer from food insecurity in the United States. A lack of healthy and nutritious foods can have lasting health effects on child development,

If Thompson’s plans go through, the average household would receive no more than $7 per month in 2033 to feed their entire family, a number that many people would have trouble living off for just one day.

Advertisement
Advertisement

You May Also Like

The Most Dangerous Tree in the World Grows in the United States – It’s 12,000x More Lethal Than a Rattlesnake

Thousands Of People Live Downstream From Dams- Most Do Not Realize The Potential Risks

Kroger CEO Defends High Prices, Claims It’s not The Company’s Fault

New Study: West Coast Faces an Imminent Catastrophic Earthquake – ‘The Big One’

Culture War in America Is Destroying the Media Industry

Creator of Ozempic Defends the High Price Point, Saying It’s Reducing the Cost of Obesity

World’s Largest Man-Made River Faces Challenges in $25 Billion Initiative

DeSantis Approved Religious Guidance in Florida Schools- Satanic Temple Vows to ‘Raise Hell’